1 response

  1. James
    May 31, 2017

    To a certain extent I agree. However, I think there’s a counter-argument to be made. Students don’t know the material, and therefore don’t always know what’s in their best interests. In a long, complex educational program (as in any long, complex program) the utility of some aspect, particularly at the beginning, may not be readily apparent. For example: To a student who wants to be a scientist, the utility of literature classes is not going to be obvious. It’s absolutely critical–scientists are writers as much as anything else!–but to a student starting down that path, it will appear a waste of time.

    To a certain extent this can be overcome by a teacher explaining the utility of the class, but given the number of potential fields a child can enter into it’s unreasonable to expect a teacher to know how their field applies to all potential other fields a child can come up with.

    I think there’s a balance to be struck. On the one hand, you’re correct in saying that a child should be taught that they are the authors of their own lives. On the other hand, teachers should know more about the subject than the student, and therefore the student should differ to some extent to the teacher. How much of an extent is of course an open question, and I certainly agree that we’ve gone much, much too far towards the teachers dictating what will be learned (and, via standardized testing, towards bureaucrats doing so). I merely caution against allowing the pendulum to swing too far the other way.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top
mobile desktop