3 responses

  1. Stephen Dahl
    January 9, 2014

    Is there a more prickly subject than “anti-Semitism”? The term itself seems to alight on the purity of the Jewish people, being Semitic, or descendants of Shem through Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. We are dragged into a religious discussion, because to be a Jew (in ancient times) was to be descended from Jacob and, if a male, to be circumcised. Converts were always referred to as “proselytes”. Rabbinical tradition demanded a Jewish mother before the child could be considered “Jewish”. So, there is a blood-tie, as it were, a “racial” connection.
    However, according to their Scriptures, the “Jews” (the term does not appear in the Bible until later books, Ezra, Esther, e.g.) are disobedient and blasphemous. According to Isaiah and Jeremiah, they will be punished for 70 years in Babylon, but then the temple will be rebuilt (it was destroyed by Nebuchadnezzer) by a certain date, which took place. Now we diverge. Jesus warned that the new temple would be destroyed and “that not one stone will be left upon another,” a prophecy which took place in 70 A.D. Indeed, he tells the Jews, “your kingdom is taken from you.” According to Moses, the Jews will be “scattered to the corners of the earth” which also comes to pass. At that point pointless and irrational persecution of these splinter groups will occur.

    According to the Greek Scriptures (ignored by Orthodox Jews in particular) one may only come to God through the Son, that is, the sacrifice of Jesus which removes the sin of Adam. This must occasion a baptism of water and spirit. Circumcision is no longer required. Where are we now?

    The comments of Karl Marx are the most pungent and somewhat opaque, for he also writes in private letters that when the Socialist revolution is complete, “the children of Israel shall have everything…” and other remarks. So the history of the Jews is pockmarked with hatred and revulsion, but in earlier days the Law of Moses was the most advanced code of regulations, and, the Ten Commandments critical to organized society. Adolf Hitler said in a speech, “As general rules of society these cannot be bettered.” Anti-Semitism therefore seems to be a reaction of the Gentile world to the Jewish minorities within it (Einstein’s view). The worst Shylocks and shysters among the Chosen have caused enormous hatred of the remainder of Jewry, who, like most people, just want to live in peace and prosper.

    There is no question that “Jews” control the media and most financial circles in the US today, and that they have infiltrated the US government (for better or for worse). The pro-Zionist stance of America and the advent of Kissinger types in higher office add to the flames of “anti-Semitism”. Most of the Israeli atrocities, such as the large scale selling of children’s body parts (after an “autopsy”), for which an Israeli general was convicted (twenty million dollars skim off) did not appear in US papers but, ironically, in Ha’aretz, via the Internet. But it was not kept on the website long. Other atrocities against the Palestinians are justified by previous Palestinian atrocities against the Israelis, ad nauseam, but are rarely covered in detail by US media. Whomever opposes Israel is either an “anti-Semite” or worse, “a Nazi.” Particularly after the disclosure of concentration camp horrors after WWII.

    Those who argue that the Jews have lost God’s blessing can not dispute Moses’ claim that “God will not forget the Israelites.” They can’t be exterminated or ignored, but as Christopher Hitchens claimed, “they use religion to dispossess Palestinians of the land on which they’ve lived for millennia.” The main source of sympathy and support for the Jews from Gentiles is their “chosen people” status, that Jesus was a Jew, and that “salvation comes only through the Jews,” as the Samaritan woman told Jesus at the well. We have a gigantic rolling snowball of religion, race, politics, finance, prophecy and misunderstanding. Atheists will disavow Moses and Christ, believers will say “We’ve got to help Israel” (or a curse will come on us?). The Bible suggests that those Jews who will be “saved” have become “spiritual Israelites, circumsized in the spirit [the heart]” whereas politicians vary from country to country, whatever its ‘religion’. In general the Jews are disliked more than ‘hated’, and among their own kind a formal distrust rules. I once worked with a Russian Jew in selling resort lots and he handed me the phone. It was a Jewish customer interested in the property. “You take this one,” he said, “a Jew can’t sell a Jew.”

    Crazy enough — one must agree! Perhaps Nietzsche was more accurate in saying that anti-Semitism is prevalent and permissible if it does not go to extremes such as concentration camps or pogroms. Let’s not forget the Jews built ghettos in European cities TO PROTECT THEMSELVES against Gentile corruption — both in religion and in dietary matters. Gentiles eat pork and crustaceans no Jew would touch. Whereas many of the above comments are hateful, we do not know their context. Perhaps Luther was cheated by a Jew. There is a Grimm’s fairy tale in which a Jew cheats a widow who dies and the Jew is hanged as an accomplice. Not very nice. But Hitler forbade the persecution of Dr. Bloch, who tended his mother’s cancer, and of his Lieutenant in WWI, with the regret that “if there were more Jews like this, we should not have to deport them all.” There are two unhappy sides to this fence, alas. The innocents suffer worse than the guilty. Jews like Trotsky and Lenin killed millions more than Hitler. But that does not excuse Hitler, and it does not entitle people to hate this people. It’s one of those issues which tend toward oversimplification and hypocrisy. It’s rather like blaming Einstein for Hiroshima, an event which horrified him.

    The argument has continued since the Enlightenment policy of freeing the Jews from their narrow bonds. The Jews are one of the most interesting peoples in history, and perhaps the only family of man vaguely preserved in their bloodlines. The Hittites, the Amorites, the Midianites, the Jebusites — pick any “ite” you want, they’re extinct. Perhaps the word “Jew” is also misleading, perhaps it should be “Yiddish” rather than “Jewish.” The latter word is a nickname derived from Judah, the only faithful section of the holy land. I’ve studied this conundrum for decades and can only say, “we have to live and let live.” At least in America there is ample space for ALL tribes!

    Reply

  2. Dr Jewstein
    March 17, 2015

    Starting at the top:
    1. Let’s make things simple. From an orthadox perspective, a Jew is a person whose mother is Jewish. This is both necessary, AND SUFFICIENT (a Jew can be un circumcised). This definition makes it hard to categorise Jews neatly into one type; race, ethnicity etc. An intersection of several factors is at play. There is no conspiracy theory with the term Jew. The original tribe was called Hebrews, but even they accepted converts. As many tribes were lost through roman occupation of the land of Israel. With the majority of remenants being specifically from the tribe of Judah. The name changed to jews.
    2. The massive amounts of history condensed into two paragraphs is a bit absurd. “the “Jews” are disobedient and blasphemous”; has no context. The old testement explains they are many things, at times they turn away from God and other times towards him. To pick out two adjectives as THE adjectives seems unfair. Further the orthadox tradition explains that the second temple would always be destroyed and this too is part of the plan (Rabbi Akiva, bMakkot24)
    3. Greek religious Scriptures are ignored by Orthadox Jews because they are Christian scriptures and have no bearing on the Jewish faith. Circumcision is not about the sin of Adam in the Jewish faith.
    4. “So the history of the Jews is pockmarked with hatred and revulsion”…I don’t see how this follows from anything that has been said. Also a source for the quote attributed to Marx is missing, and I suspect does not exist. And why Marx is even relevant to your point.
    5. “The worst Shylocks and shysters”, forgetting the particular choice of language. Every group/denomination/race, have good people and bad people, and the jews are certainly no worse than many others. Why then should it be the Jews who are painted with the same brush as their worst elements, as opposed to any other group.
    6. Paragraph beginning “there is no question”. Sorry to say it. This is a bigoted paragraph. Whilst in the US there are many Jews in media, there are also many non-Jews in media. Even if Jews are overrepresented in media the notion of “control” is not evidentially based. Same applies to financial circles. And the term “infiltrated the US government”, is also anti-semitic, “infiltrate” implies forcing your way in to a place you don’t belong. Jews are as much a part of American democracy as anyone else, and hence they are fully entitled to a role in political sphere.
    7. “Body parts” this is a conspiracy theory. Find one legitamate article from a single respected news agency on this topic, which brings evidence. You cannot. This is an anti-semitic allegation, a recreation of the blood libel.
    8. “atrocities against the Palestinians”…the Israel-Palestine conflict is horrible. But to summarise it so partially, with no sense of nuance or context, and 0 culpability on the side of the Palestinians is problematic. And biased.
    9. “Jews built the ghettos for protection”; you need to check your facts sir.

    With regards to excusing Hitler, and Luther etc. I refer you to point 5.

    Reply

  3. Irene
    February 26, 2019

    From the LA Times article “Who Runs Hollywood? C’mon”: “How deeply Jewish is Hollywood? When the studio chiefs took out a full-page ad in the Los Angeles Times a few weeks ago to demand that the Screen Actors Guild settle its contract, the open letter was signed by: News Corp. President Peter Chernin (Jewish), Paramount Pictures Chairman Brad Grey (Jewish), Walt Disney Co. Chief Executive Robert Iger (Jewish), Sony Pictures Chairman Michael Lynton (surprise, Dutch Jew), Warner Bros. Chairman Barry Meyer (Jewish), CBS Corp. Chief Executive Leslie Moonves (so Jewish his great uncle was the first prime minister of Israel), MGM Chairman Harry Sloan (Jewish) and NBC Universal Chief Executive Jeff Zucker (mega-Jewish). If either of the Weinstein brothers had signed, this group would have not only the power to shut down all film production but to form a minyan with enough Fiji water on hand to fill a mikvah.

    The person they were yelling at in that ad was SAG President Alan Rosenberg (take a guess). The scathing rebuttal to the ad was written by entertainment super-agent Ari Emanuel (Jew with Israeli parents) on the Huffington Post, which is owned by Arianna Huffington (not Jewish and has never worked in Hollywood.)

    The Jews are so dominant, I had to scour the trades to come up with six Gentiles in high positions at entertainment companies. When I called them to talk about their incredible advancement, five of them refused to talk to me, apparently out of fear of insulting Jews. The sixth, AMC President Charlie Collier, turned out to be Jewish.”

    This is a bit more than slight over-representation of a group that makes up 2% of the American population.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top
mobile desktop