Stephen Hicks

Roark’s failure and Keating’s success — *The Fountainhead* Part I [80th Anniversary series]

The Fountainhead‘s themes are independence and integrity. In Part One, novelist Ayn Rand’s primary purpose is to contrast the characters Howard Roark and Peter Keating. Here is a table summarizing the main events in each young man’s early career. Structurally, each plot event for Roark is matched by an opposite event for Keating. Roark’s career […]

Roark’s failure and Keating’s success — *The Fountainhead* Part I [80th Anniversary series] Read More »

Socialists and the Berlin Wall — disturbing changing attitudes

Socialists in 1980: “We use walls, barbed wire, and men with guns to control our people. Deal with it.” Socialists in 2000: “We’re ashamed of the Wall, but now we’re democratic socialists. Trust us!” Socialists in 2020: “Just kidding. Bring back the Wall!” Source: Jacobin, the Marxist/neo-Marxist true-believer magazine. Related: Marx and Engels’ The Communist

Socialists and the Berlin Wall — disturbing changing attitudes Read More »

Rimsky-Korsakov on the “hardship” of the composer’s life

According to Shostakovich: “Rimsky-Korsakov used to say that he refused to acknowledge any complaints from composers about their hard lot in life. He explained his position thus: Talk to a bookkeeper and he’ll start complaining about life and his work. Work has ruined him, it’s so dull and boring. You see, the bookkeeper had planned

Rimsky-Korsakov on the “hardship” of the composer’s life Read More »

Sartre on dealing with bad faith “anti-racists”

What Jean-Paul Sartre said about the anti-Semites of his day applies perfectly to the language-and-emotion manipulating so-called “anti-racists” of our day: “Never believe that anti-Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who

Sartre on dealing with bad faith “anti-racists” Read More »

Paperback edition of Explaining Postmodernism new for 2023

I’m pleased that the book is still in print after so many years, and especially pleased with this new paperback printing. Explaining Postmodernism is a philosophical intellectual history of the roots of postmodernism. Its one-sentence thesis is: The failure of epistemology made postmodernism possible; the failure of socialism made postmodernism necessary. Here are links to

Paperback edition of Explaining Postmodernism new for 2023 Read More »