1 response

  1. Bruno Della Motta
    April 3, 2018

    “Any thinker who concludes that in principle reason cannot know reality is not fundamentally an advocate of reason.”

    I would say that anyone — I wouldn’t say a thinker, because a thinker wouldn’t do that — who concludes that in principle reason can know reality — as the totality of everything — is not fundamentally an advocate of reason, but a theist who believes in platonic essences and scholastic-aristotelian species intelligibilis…

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top
mobile desktop