“The normal fuck,” writes Andrea Dworkin, “by a normal man is taken to be an act of invasion and ownership undertaken in a mode of predation.”
For more on the implications of Dworkin’s claim for postmodernism, see my Explaining Postmodernism: Skepticism from Rousseau to Foucault.
Information about other editions and translations is available at this dedicated page.
This woman was unstable. Rather than put psychological issues onto society, she should have been in therapy.
Ad hominem is not a valid argument.
Why is she defined as post modern? Why isn’t she just a feminist or radical feminist?
Because she and co-author Catharine MacKinnon use (a) collectivized, (b) social constructionist, and (c) basic-adversarialism premises in their arguments for, e.g., (d) censoring pornography. So they’re not pre-modern and they’re not modern. See the discussion starting at 46:30 for details: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-kA8zi10cjo.