Education’s “Public Choice” Dynamic

Education-Public-Choice-Dynamic Arguments for government involvement in education are many. They include the views that many parents cannot afford to educate their children, that private philanthropy cannot make up the deficit, that too many parents don’t care enough about education, and more.

At the same time, government involvement in education has risks:

* Less parental control over and responsibility for their children.
* The driving out of low-cost private schooling.
* Adding to class-warfare tensions.
* Lobbying by private schools for exemptions and special favors.

Here is a flowchart of a few lines of development. The chart is in Excel spreadsheet and JPEG imagee versions.

This simplified version does not include the role of bureaucracy, unions, the lessened accountability, or the use of education as a bait-and-switch tactic for tax increases, for example. So please feel welcome to add to the chart and otherwise modify for your own purposes.

Education-Public-Choice-Dynamic

Source: The chart is inspired in part by E. G. West’s important Education and the State< /em> (1965; third edition 1994), a classic early text applying public choice analysis to education.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *