Letter to Roger Weightman, on the planned celebrations of the 50th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence
Monticello June 24. 26
Respected Sir
The kind invitation I receive from you on the part of the citizens of the city of Washington, to be present with them at their celebration of the 50th. anniversary of American independance; as one of the surviving signers of an instrument pregnant with our own, and the fate of the world, is most flattering to myself, and heightened by the honorable accompaniment proposed for the comfort of such a journey. it adds sensibly to the sufferings of sickness, to be deprived by it of a personal participation in the rejoicings of that day. but acquiescence is a duty, under circumstances not placed among those we are permitted to controul. I should, indeed, with peculiar delight, have met and exchanged there congratulations personally with the small band, the remnant of that host of worthies, who joined with us on that day, in the bold and doubtful election we were to make for our country, between submission or the sword; and to have enjoyed with them the consolatory fact, that our fellow citizens, after half a century of experience and prosperity, continue to approve the choice we made.
may it be to the world, what I believe it will be, (to some parts sooner, to others later, but finally to all,) the Signal of arousing men to burst the chains, under which monkish ignorance and superstition had persuaded them to bind themselves, and to assume the blessings & security of self-government. that form which we have substituted, restores the free right to the unbounded exercise of reason and freedom of opinion. all eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. the general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view. the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately, by the grace of god. these are grounds of hope for others. for ourselves, let the annual return of this day forever refresh our recollections of these rights, and an undiminished devotion to them.
I will ask permission here to express the pleasure with which I should have met my ancient neighbors of the City of Washington and of it’s vicinities, with whom I passed so many years of a pleasing social intercourse; an intercourse which so much relieved the anxieties of the public cares, and left impressions so deeply engraved in my affections, as never to be forgotten. with my regret that ill health forbids me the gratification of an acceptance, be pleased to receive for yourself, and those for whom you write, the assurance of my highest respect and friendly attachments.
Th. Jefferson
[Source: Library of Congress.]
After reading this exemplary statement of expression and regret that Thomas couldn’t attend the ceremony, I am forced to consider a comparison with this high quality of expression to that of President Trump.
Imagine, if you will, retired President Jefferson, in such high language, debating HMIH Donald Trump about the value of the Rights of Man and liberty in general. Should herr Trumpf have actually lived in the era and had influence, he would have certainly demanded there be a king-like figure as head of the nascent government (namely himself!). Every Founder, save Alexander Hamilton who wanted a sort of king, would have opposed him vehemently and st length.
I am certain Mr. Jefferson and many compatriots would’ve exactly and deliberately reduced our current self-aggrandizing transactional power monger president, who at his 2025 Inauguration boasted he was more popular and greater than George Washington (and previously Abraham Lincoln), to disjointed jigsaw pieces. They would’ve met our 21st (mentally 15th) century Fearless Leader head-on. Perhaps, in the case of George Washington, even upon The Field of Honor.