2 responses

  1. Edward Fox
    October 19, 2013

    This is so invaluable. Most critiques of Rand’s ethics try to equate it with Nietzsche’s, Stirner’s or Spencer’s, i.e. merely reversing altruism’s sacrifice of self to others with sacrifice of others to self. Rand of course held BOTH profoundly immoral, and her great achievement was in articulating a non-sacrificial, non-zero-sum ethic.

    As she noted, the Enlightenment concept of individual rights had been implicitly based on such an ethic, but it was never explicated and grounded. As she also noted, every political theory is implicitly or explicitly based on an ethical one. Kant’s denial of the ethical concept of the self proved the sine qua non for Hegel’s denial of the political concept of the individual that paved the way for the sacrificial inferno of modern collectivism.

    Reply

  2. Wolfgang
    October 17, 2019

    Awesome overview, I found the section on Nietzsche’s The Geneology of Morals enlightenening. Would it be possible to have the second part uploaded via an MP3. Found this via ThinkSpot.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top
mobile desktop